Sver
Full Member
Posts: 145
|
Post by Sver on Feb 10, 2020 7:34:59 GMT -5
Hoi Sarossell
"I'd like to return the thread to the subject of interest and ask what changes you might suggest to make the code more "userfriendly"?"
Chris: "I think he's trying to make sure that what comes out actually got decrypted properly, and wasn't corrupted." Right
When a user or i typed a wrong password and forgot what he typed, there is a problem. That's the reason to add a check-word included in the encrypted text.
You re right when i send more encrypted messages, encrypted with the same password, the level will be lower,
It's dependend how i/they use it.
Encrypted one database or a document, it's no problem. You can never find a pattern when you found or steal it.
Sending a message or more. When we/i sending message(s), i can use every time a new password. There 'll no pattern. The new password for the next message is included in the uncrackable message. You can read the next message. When i ll recieve a message, i know the password that i give to you. No pattern.
For a lot of users the level is enough and more "userfrienly." Thanks for sharing
|
|