|
|
Post by tenochtitlanuk on Feb 24, 2019 4:33:35 GMT -5
My programs often use syntax of 1E9 instead of 1000000000 This seems not acceptable to LB5. Is this going to be implemented?
|
|
|
|
Post by tenochtitlanuk on Feb 24, 2019 4:41:08 GMT -5
Also, a program that works in LB4.5 failed with 'product could not be expressed by a double' when all the numbers lie 3E9 were changed to 3000000000.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl Gundel on Feb 24, 2019 14:39:17 GMT -5
Also, a program that works in LB4.5 failed with 'product could not be expressed by a double' when all the numbers lie 3E9 were changed to 3000000000. Could you give a code example? |
|
|
|
Post by tenochtitlanuk on Feb 24, 2019 17:03:26 GMT -5
Sorry, have been trying lots of my programs and don't remember which it was. Will report if I see it again. Thanks for clarifying the exponential notation- I should have thought of trying 1e20 rather than 1E20...
I search my code for savebmp and for the occasional '#file, nnn, ....' to rem out the missing command and the , that used to be accepted following the old syntax of print #f, ..... Saves a lot of LB5 hangs!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Iverson on Mar 13, 2019 23:48:15 GMT -5
Fixed in build 348.
|
|
